Answers to criticism ()
Some criticisms of modern astrology go like this: "Traditional astrology is serious, it's about fate, events and predictions. Modern astrology is just vague woo hoo about subjective feelings.." Science forced the Church to accept that the earth was round, spinning and not the centre of the universe. If traditional astrology had been that powerful it would have convinced both Church and Science. Modern or traditional, astrology is not omniscient and all powerful. Between all and nothing, there is a spectrum you know! I’ve heard about experiments made by scientists. They asked a number of subjects to take personality tests. Then they submitted the tests and the astrological charts to famous astrologers asking them to pair charts and test results. Their rate of success was not higher than chance would predict. To me, this doesn’t mean that astrology is not valid. This may well mean that the astrologers, even though renowned in the field, were actually not magicians. Taylor